About Me

Name: ChrisR
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
My World Info

Double Stuff Post

I could go for some oreos, on that note.
 
Since I no-showed yesterday's post, I am going to cover twice the information today. 
 
Mets have own 3 in a row.  Let's try to keep this streak alive.
 
The Spurs got knocked out of the Playoffs by the lakers, and really, I can't say I am upset.  I really hate watching the Spurs play. 
 
Speaking of which, the NBA is going to start fining players for flopping.  Manu and Tony Parker, kiss your success goodbye.
 
US Air is so cheap that they are getting rid of on-board snacks.  Seriously. 
 
Just got back from an absolutely BEAST BBQ lunch.  KG - good choice on Old Glory.  Very nice.  And I like the multiple selections for sauces - Lexington, Kansas City, SE Texas, East Carolina,  Memphis and Savannah. 
 
I jus discovered this new band from DC.  Not exactly my style, buit I thought they were pretty fun.  Kind of reminds me of the Black Eyed Peas.  They have a wacky name, though -  Mambo Sauce
 
Condi Rice joins the KISS Army.  (More to come on that)
 
Another freakin crane collapsed in NYC.  They really have to find a way to stop this.  Not to mention that I am now scared to walk near any cranes in this metropolitan area.
 
I saw the new Indiana Jones a few days ago.  And I really really enjoyed it.  From this point on in this article, I will spoil the movie.  Soif you don't want to read this - stop here.  Got it?  Good.  I will use boldface again when you can continue reading without spoilers.
 
The thing is, if you went in expecting some cinematic masterpiece, you were dead wrong.  If you went in expecting some adventure movie with good action scenes and chase scenes and some humor, you wouldve really enjoyed this movie.  If you thought it was below expectations, you may have a point, but if you thought it was far inerior to the originals, you have to watch the originals again.  Any of te first 3 was just as unbelievable and far-fetched as this one. 
 
I really like Shia La'Beouff in this film.  Really liked the character he played and it added a little new flavor to the Indy character.  Although they already did the "bumbling yet smart sidekick" thing with Sean Connery in The Last Crusade, it still worked.  One of my problems, though, was that Connery was supposedly dead in this movie.  How?  He drank from the Cup of Christ in Last Crusade, thus giving him supposed eternal life.  And now that I think about it - Indiana Jones did too.  How was there any fear of him dying/not being immortal in this film?  As someone attempted to explain to me, immortality likely only applied inside the cave where the cup came from, like where the knight was.  Anyway, enough about a 19 year old movie and onto the new one...
 
I had a lot of notes as for what I did and didn't really liek about this movie. I really liked the references to Area 51 and a historical context.  I really liked the nuclear bomb testing site, but I didn't love that he somehow mysteriously survived in a refrigerator.  Seriously?  Ridiculous.  I liked the evil / then good again, then evil again "partner" who's name escapes me.  I liked that they brought back Marion.  I LOVED it how they put in the arc of the covenant, in an almost inconsequential  yet "smart" nod to the originals.  I liked that this dealt with aliens - they had to do something "supernatural" but they kind of exhausted the whole Christian thing.  I liked the direction it went.  The fight scenes and chase scenes were excellent, minus where Mutt does the swinging through the trees with the monkeys.  That was a cheap attempt at little-kid humor and really just came off as lame.  I relaly liked the jokes behind the across-campus chase and the fight in the restaurant between the greasers and the preps - a real fun nod to the time period.  I think, though, that this movie had a few too many influences from more recent movies.  The sword fight across the 2 speeding cars was right out of the 2nd Pirates of the CArribbean, although not with cars, obviously.  The ants were 100% ripped off of the bugs from the Mummy.  As was the melting sand-city thing with the imploding temple at the end.  I liked the battles with the Soviets though - the Nazis were defeated too soon after the Last Crusade was supposed to take place. 
 
On to my major criticism of the movie - the end.  Seriosuly, this was ridiculous.  I get the alien thing.  I thought it was pretty intriguing, although the temple as the space ship was ridiculously predictable.  I think that actually was in another movie as well, but I can't put my finger on what.  I didn't like that the aliens like came to life, either.  The CGI scenes is really where they lost the audience.  I really didn't get why the Soviet woman's brain like exploded from too much knowledge from the aliens?  Really, didn't make any sense to me.  But, as I said earlier, the first 3 movies were sci-fi in nature too - this was not that far outside the realm of possibility. 
 
This was a throw-back to the earlier movies, with a more modern twist.  The CGI was not overpowering in most scenes, and it was FUN.  This was what Indiana Jones was supposed to be - a fun movie to enjoy.  It's not winning any awards, and yes, we all know that Harrison Ford in well into his life with the AARP, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't a good thrill ride.  I was on the edge of my seat the whole time, excited to see what happens next.  You have to suspend disbelief to go see any movie, really, and this was no different.  I give it a serious thumbs up. 
 
OK  - TIME IN
 
One last note - extra points to the movie, too, for the cameo by one Ernie Reyes, Jr - who some of you may remember as Keno from TMNT 2: the Secret of the Ooze. 
 
Ok, back to reality.
 
Turns out that Stonehenge is actually a burial ground.  Well, that makes sense I guess.  If you have ever been, you know that there are burial mounds everywhere around the area - they are hills with people buried in them as opposed to digging into the ground to bury the dead.  Not that surprising in the long run, but an interesting fact that needed to be revealed.  Also on the note of Stonehenge?  Really not that impressive.  They might be 10-15 feet tall, max.  They look a ton bigger on TV and in pictures when, in actuality, it's not that massive.  Impressive knowing what these ancient cultures did, yes, but not as incredible as you might think. 
 
One of my favorite sports talk radio shows, Max Kellerman and Brian Kenney on ESPN 1050 in NYC recently made an excellent point about great baseball teams : the 3-starter rule.  For most teams, your #3 starter is the solid guy, consistent, but not great, who gets the job done and eats innings, albeit no better than league average.  #4 is your risky guy, high-risk high-reward, and your 5 is the weak link who likely won't make it through much of the year.  The elite teams, though, have their #3 guy as a front-line guy, who the team can put confidence in.  2 starters aren't going to do it - it takes 3.  Take, for example, the 2007 Red Sox.  Beckett, Schilling, Dice-K.  Dice-K is a front-line guy on most teams, thus, a great team.  The Mets, assuming they are healthy, have John Maine as the #3 guy.  This is an above-average guy who can make a team great.  The Yankees, assuming they move Joba into the rotatiton, will have Wang, Pettitte, and Chamberlain - a very formidable trio.  Then take a team like the Reds: Harang is a clear #1, Volquez is a great 2, but then who?  Arroyo, Cueto?  Neither of these guys instills confidence.  How about the Cubs?  Zambrano, Lilly,  Rich Hill?  Dempster?  Jason Marquis?  These are not elite guys and will hold back the Cubs.  The Diamondbacks will compete in the playoffs because of Webb, Haren, and any combination of Randy Johnson or Doug Davis or Micah Owings.  The Angels can throw out Lackey, Weaver, Escobar .... The Indians can throw Sabbathia, Carmona, Lee at you.  The truly elite teams have 3 very good to great pitchers. 
 
And since I promised a nice hefty entry today, consider this thought to close things out...
 
What if the North loses Gettysburg?  How would this change the course of history?
What if Neville Chamberlain never appeases Hitler?
What if the Republicans never split in 1912 and gave Wilson the presidency?
What if Al Gore wins in 2000?
 
These are significant events that would seriously change the course of history, as decided by one single moment.  Certain things are inevitable - technology, for example - so even if man hadn't gone to the moon in 1969, it would have happened eventually.  Yet these questions make one wonder - what if there was a slight change in reality - a single lost battle, one bone-headed diplomatic tactic, two monster egos dividing a party, or a few hundred votes in Florida.  These small changes could have permanently altered history.  Just think about it...
 
Got any other examples? 
 
In sports...
what if the Soviets never cheated to win the 1976 basketball title?
What if Thurman Munson never died?
What if Babe Ruth was never sold to the Yankees?
What if David Tyree drops The E-macculate Connetion?
What if Dan Marino wins the Super Bowl in his second season?
What if Tiger Woods loses the 97 Masters? 
 
What if Tom Cruise is passed up for the role in Risky Business?
 
just some Friday food for thought.
 
And now, have a good weekend everybody!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Post Today

Working on the next installment of HamNation. 
 
I promise a double post tomorrow with an attempt at substantial information.  Indiana Jones review, some baseball chatter (non-Mets), hopefully I can get around to watching the Office season finale.  Any requests?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I need new subject lines

I'm a little late today.  Sue me.
 
Ok let's get moving.  No Mets today.  Spurs lost last night on a questionable call, but due to the amount of dirty plays they make, they deserve to lose in this fashion.  Ryan Zimmerman bobblehead day is coming up at Nats park.  And that's enough sports for now.
 
I am super excited about the DC BBQ festival.  And I might even go to the NYC BBQ festival if it fits into my schedule.
 
I'm thiking about giving myself a new nickname on the basketball court.  I know, it's totally not kosher to give yourself a nickname, but whatever.  I've tried a variety of names - Who wants to sex motumbo had the best staying power.  The Banker never caught on (block a shot and yell out NO DEAL!).  I'm the only one who refers to myself as the White Steve Nash.  But I think I really ahve something here.  You can start calling me Tim Russert.... because you're about to Meet the Press (due to my defensive prowess).  Unfortunately, anyone who has ever played wiht me knows that I don't do defense and rebounding.  This is where the irony lies.
 
A city in California wants to secede and move to Nevada
 
 Serious Eats is running an article about the 10 Nostalgic foods they would like to see back in circulation.  It's a fun trip down memory lane.
 
I know this blog post has been a little weak.  It's lacking in the meat.  Some say where's the beef?  Which reminds me, isn't it popular for bloggers to talk about personal things?
 
The question, then, is what is stocking my refrigerator right now?  I am not going to list everything, but I am going to list something which irks me.  I often yell at a friend of mine for having an absolutely mind-boggling number of condiments.  But then, upon analysis, it turns out that I in fact have a ton of condiments.  Like, a serious ton.  Maybe it's because I am OCD and use a different product for each different food - there is no blanket condiment that can be used on more than one thing.  So how many condiments is too many? 
 
This is all from memory, so bear with me...  There is some bbq sauce, some yellow mustard (for hot dogs), some honey mustard (for sandwiches, obviously), ketchup, spicy red pepper tomato sauce, 4-cheese cheaper tomato sauce (for things like meatballs or meat sauce), A1 (for burgers and steaks), ranch dressing, russian dressing, Favazza's italian dressing, balsamic vinegar, regular salsa, pineapple salsa (seriously the best stuff ever - go buy a jar and you will be hooked - I recommend Newman's), tequila lime salsa (do you like to eat tequila?  me neither.  this stuff is nasty), alfedo sauce, parmesan cheese, frank's red hot sauce (for things demanding hot sauce), jamaican pepper sauce (for flavoring dishes), jerk sauce (for chicken), sweet chipotle sauce (chicken), sesame garlic sauce (chicken), taco sauce, more bbq sauce (a different brand - sweeter, for pulled pork), about 15 different kinds of jelly (but those aren't mine)....and thats all I can remember for now.  How much is too much?  My cousin Matt notoriously is critical of leaving a tiny bit of salad dressing in the fridge because it takes up too much space for too little pay-off.  At what point should I start tossing things?  It's actually pretty funny - my roommate can attest to the fact that I will often eat things, not because I am in the mood for them necessarily, but rather because I am sick of looking at it.  I ate bacon and eggs twice this past weekend.  Why?  Because I was sick of looking at them in the back of the fridge.  This weekend we exclusively drank MGD beer - why?  Because it had been there for more months that it was aesthetically pleasing, despite the fact that none of us particularly care for it.  Am I nuts?  Or is this a reasoanble situation.  Please, assure me that I am not actually the Anal Retentive Chef.  (Sorry can't find a link - but it is the 10 year anniversary of Phil Hartman's death - RIP).
 
Since that was ridiculous, how about what's on my desk?  Quite literally nothing.  2 TH magazines.  A few bobbleheads.   phone.  My blackberry.  My cube is decorated with Rally Towels from sporting events, and a picture of TH's John Hanlon photoshopped into Prince Caspian.  I like free counter-space...what?
 
And finally, a fun video courtesy of TH's Kevin Glass - who, by the way, writes an excellent blog.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Swear, Not a Lot of Mets...

I was warneed to keep my Mets commentary under 1 paragraph if I want to keep my readers.  That's fine, I can do that.  It will just be a really long paragraph. 
 
I kid.  I am putting a hold on discussing the Mets at length until Willie Randolph is fired.  But that's neither here nor there as I have a quick note to share.  Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports wrote an article about the Mets and how people say they are too Latin - and how this is completely ridiculous.  What you need is chemistry within your team - something the Mets and Tigers do not have.  He uses the 2006 Tigers, the Red Sox, the Cardinals and the Phillies as examples of "chemistry" teams (and you can see my comments on the article under the nickname Razzmission).  This should be noted, though:
 
The Mets have 19 players out of 32 members of the active roster.
The Tigers have 13 of 30.  These are the "bad chemisty" teams.
 
The good?
The Red Sox - 7 of 27.
The Cardinals - 6 of 33.
The Phillies - 5 of 30.
The 2006 Tigers - 8 of 27.
 
Maybe there is something to this argument....
 
Ok, enough about that.  How about some hard-hitting stuff that you're used to here at My World.
 
First, for those that don't know, Mary Katharine Ham is leaving Townhall on June 10.  I would wish her the best of luck, but I secretly hate her guts (and now you're all in on the secret too.)  I am actually scouling at her as I type this.
 
Sex and the City seems to be the most important thing to every girl aged 20-25.  Really?  I just don'get it.  Anyone who knows me knows that I am very anti-censorship and often appreciate foul humor as much as anyone.  But this show is borderline porn, yet somehow snuck on TV.  An afficionado says that 3 of the 4 main characters are all regularly nude on the show.  If this was a show about guys sitting around talking about their sexual exploits, complete with imagery, it would most certainly not be allowed on television.  I'm just sayin...  And because the Sex and the City movie is coming out this Friday, it felt like an acceptable time to address the issue.  This show is stupid, was barely allowed on HBO, and has absolutely no business on TBS.  I don't get how TBS can show a program entirely about stuff that gets blurred or beeped out.  Why bother at that point? 
 
The woman who named underwear "bloomers" was born today back in 18something (I tossed the Express already, sorry).  I only point this out because I think my mother is the only person under the age of 10,000 who still uses that phrase. 
 
 
Frank is a good chef.  He grilled for yesterday's festivities and went all out - chicken and steak fajitas with homemade guac, 2 kinds of salsa, grilled veg, etc etc.  Really an excellent job.  Way to go Frank.
 
I took note of this during my day.  At 12:11pm on the dot, I felt a huge wave of tired hit me.  And I have been exhausted ever since.
 
Many readers of this blog come from all over the country - I am from New York, Kevin is from Texas/Florida/Russia/UK, Katie is from StL, Megan is from Pennsylvania, Andy from Maryland, and Ms. Mitchell from Colorado by way of Texas.  Thus, the debate must be raised - grilling vs. barbecue?  I always called grilling and BBQ the same thing - the terms were interchangable.  BBQ is also applied to the sauce or the smoking/slow cooking style of ribs, pork, etc.  We even used to call our gatherings BroBQs - although we were primarily only grilling. Is there a difference in the terms?  Do people take offense when BBQ is used to mean grilling?  Does BBQ only apply to ribs and brisket?  Does Carolina style BBQ (with a vinegar based sauce) even count as BBQ?  Someone, please, enlighten me. 
 
On a final, and more ridiculous note, I have a serious problem with naked old dudes at the gym.  I get it - it's a locker room.  And I also get it - we've all seen naked dudes before.  But for the love of God, do you really have to put your socks on before your underwear?  Is it that much of a hassle to put SOMETHING on before you brush your teeth?  Do you really need to leave the shower stall before you wrap a towel around yourself?  I don't get annoyed when someone makes a conscious effort to minimize their offensive nudeness, but some of the elder members of the community see no problem in parading around the changing area in the buff.  Is it entirely necessary?  I just don't get it.  It has nothing to do with being secure in your masculinity or your thoughts on homosexuals - no, this is just a simple courtesy.  When I am getting my things ready to go work out, I don't want to be staring into another guy's crotch.  Is this so much to ask?  Am I the one out of line?  In discussions with some older individuals (such as my uncle from Queens), thinks that I am the one who is weird for throwing on some undergarments as quickly as possible when changing.  Is this the case? 
 
2 debate points, both ridiculous.  Thoughts?
 
And finally, a video for the afternoon.  One of my favorite scenes from one of my favorite movies.  Featuring one of my favorite songs.  Perfect.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Memorial Day Is a Good Day

TH HQ is letting us out early today, right around when i would normally blog.  So no blog today! 
 
And on top of that, nothing to really talk about today. 
 
See you all Tuesday!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not One of my Finer Efforts

Ok today is the end of the Mets-Idol format of the blog.  Because Idol is over.
 
American Idol ended last night and David Cook won.  He was my pick all along, and then i abandoned that pick yesterday.  I was wrong, and I am happy to be wrong.  The more marketable perfomer won.  Now, a catch on that. I think that Americna Idol is completely bogus.  Not rigged necessarily, but if their guy doesn't win the votes, they are going to give it to him anywyas.  They're not letting a good looking but bad singer take the crown.  Case in point, last night's show.  Remember how I blogged yesterday about how Archuleta needs the AI title to have a career?  I still agree with thtat.  However, I also see that the producers, I'm sure, said to themselves, "Chris Daughtry is more successful than all but 2 idol winners - clarkson and underwood - we are not missing out on another one of his caliber.  Idol is a niche audience, and its winners have niche appeal.  Ruben Studdard, Fantasia, Taylor Hicks, I am loooking at you.  However, when there is an opportunity to have mass appeal and sell 4.5 million records (like Daughtry did with his first abum), it's time to abandon that core audience and go for the money.  And here's the catch - Archuleta's fans will buy the Cook record; the Cook fans would not necessarily buy the Archuleta record.  Idol is a business, pure and simple.  Notice how no total votes are ever announced, no exact percentages.  There are no definitive numbers, only hypotheticals.  Yes, they said Cook won by 12 million votes.  But 12 million out of what?  What percentage was 12 million more than Archuleta?  See?  All hypotheticals.
 
Next, some light stuff:
 
First, the UK hates the Boss.  Much like me.  A guy was arrested for blasting Born in the USA on repeat for hours and hours a night.  So authorities arrested him.  Mostly because of the song selection.  Although I am just making that assumption, it makes perfect sense.
 
Airlines are beginning to charge an extra fee for luggage due to increased costs of fuel.  This might be the biggest scam I have ever heard, and I am making a stand right now, I will not travel on an airline that makes such demands.  This is ludicrous - handling luggage is part of the cost of the ticket and has already been accounted for.  I can understand charing for an extra bag - but the first bag?  Oh, right, people take flights and don't bring luggage on a regular basis.  Morons.
 
Esquire listed their best bars in the country.  DC's best bars were the Tune Inn and the Hawk and Dove.  I've never been to Tune, but I can speak from experience - Hawk is one of the worst bars I have ever been to.  It is overrun by 18 year olds (because they operate under that fool-proof 18 to party, 21 to drink *wink wink* rule) Anyways, I want to know who on earth decided this was the best bar in DC.  Absolutely not. 
 
And on a final note, the Mets suck.  The Mets really suck.  The Braves announcers said it last night - this is a team that is quitting.  Willie Randolph was brought in to be the Joe Torre-esque rock that manages personalities.  He was brought in not for strategy but to keep egos in line.  He did that just fine for 2 1/2 years.  Then came the Julio Franco saga.  Willie was so damn stubborn with Franco that, despite his .160 batting average and complete inability to do anything with a pitch, he was the #1 pinch hitting option.  Supposedly it took Omar stepping in and cutting Franco to get Willie to stop playing him.  He is so stubborn and unconventional in his thinking - talent means nothing as long as you're a "proven veteran" and one his guys.  Case in point?  Luis Castillo hits about .280 with no power and no speed but with constant injuries.  Ruben Gotay hits .380 when playing regularly.  Bench Gotay and never let him see the light of day.  Eventually, he gets cut.  Never give your backup catchers a chance, and absolutely never change up your lineup. 
 
Now, Willie has lost control of the clubhouse.  Wagner takes a shot at Delgado (who, not so coincidentally, was criticized for the exact same thing last year by Lo Duca), and Willie says SNY is being too hard on him in their coverage.  Next he tells a reporter that people are hard on him because of race.  The team has no spirit.  He isn't managing those personalities too well now that he is losing.  And he can't win due to his insistence on playing guys who are past their primes - Carlos Delgado, I am again looking at you.  The lineup right now has Ryan Church (currently injured) and David Wright with no protection.  Reyes has been ok but not great, then an auto-out from Castillo, Wright, Beltran who hasn't hit a ballo ut of the infield in literally weeks, always-injured Moises Alou, Church, Delgado and light-hitting Brian Schneider.  The starting rotation isn't good but certainly could be worse....but wait, oft-injured Pedro Martinez and El Duque are some of the anchors of that rotation.  As we stand now, the Mets have semi-consistent performances out of Johan Santana and John Maine.  And that's it.
 
But no starter throws a complete game anymore.  And thus, the biggest problem with WIllie Randolph, the bullpen.  It's funny - Willie was brought in to be a Torre clone.  Level-headed and cool under the NY pressure.  And with a complete inability to manage a bullpen.  Aaron Heilman and Jorge Sosa have a combined 42 appearances and a combined ERA over 6.5.  Why on earth are they still out there?  They have shown a complete inability to get anybody out, yet night in and night out, Sosa and Heilman are blowing games out.  Matt Wise is back to give some depth, and Pedro Feliciano is always good.  Joe Smith is having a great start and Scott Schoenweiss is pitching a million times better than he was last year.  These were guys that were "proven veterans" last year, betrayed Willie's trust by underperformning (you know, like the rest of the team), and now can't get it back.  Schoenweiss is a LOOGY - yet Willie has him pitch 2 full innings.  Smith is an all-around guy....but acts as a ROOGY.  Why?  Randolph simply has no idea how to manage a bullpen.  He has no gauge on his players and has no sense of what's going on.  This is a team that is lost, and until Randolph is fired, this team is going to fall further and further out of playoff contention.  This division has underwhelmed all year, and this would have been the perfect opportunity to turn on the jets and run away.  Instead, we lose 6 of 7 to the Nats and Braves. 
 
The current state of the Mets is simply unacceptable.  $137 million for a .500 team.  Heads have to roll, starting with Randolph.
 
 
...And now, to leave a good note, here is the winning scene of AI
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Predominantly an Idol Post

Since yesterday I wrote a nice long post about Baseball, today I am going to wrie a nice long post about Idol.  But First, some quick hits:
 
Todays newspaper led with this headline : "Cash Unfair to Blind" then it accused paper money of being discriminatory.  No comment.
 
Someone tried to pay for their munchies at a gas station with a bag of marijuana.  Genius.
 
Mike Piazza, the greatest hitting catcher of all time, retired yesterday.  He's going to the Hall, but as a Met or a Dodger?  His statistical best seasons may have come as a Dodger, but his most important years came as a Met.  He broke the all-time Home Runs for a Catcher mark as a Met.  He went to the World Series as a Met.  He played in more All Star games as a Met.  He played more seasons and more games as a Met.  He was the face of a franchise as a Met...not so much as a Dodger.  And most of all.... 9/11 as a Met.
 
Hell's Kitchen might be the most underrated show on TV.  It is awesome and hilarious.  Strongly recommended.
 
"David Archuleta just has music running through his veins.  He sings what he feels at the moment.  David Cook got by using other peoples' arangements."  - Commenter in the EXPRESS.  Now, as true as that statement about Cook may be, you can't possibly believe Archuleta.  His aw-shucks, innocent little dork routine went into flames when it came to light that his insane-o Dad was the one actually pulling all the string.  Did you hear about how his dad picks all of his songs?  Or when Archuleta won the coin toss to see who performed first in the final, his dad stood up from the crowd and screamed out TAKE SECOND!!!!!! then David answered second?  But why was he in the crowd?  Oh, right, because he was banned from the backstage area for telling David to sing a lyric from a cover of a song despite being told specifically not to, as AI would then have to pay royalties to another label in addition to the original.  Oh, right.  David Archuleta sure is genuine and sings what pumps through his veins.  Kid's got no heart.
 
And that's why he'll win.  Cook is cutting his teeth on the indy scene.  Archuleta is a high school kid who has already won Star Search and has a semi-established name as a talent.  But the voting population is that which falls for Archuleta.  12 year old girls don't find 25 year old rockers attractive - they get crushes on the teenage boy.  See Jonathan Taylor Thomas, Devin Sawa, or early Joshua Jackson.  These kids were barely out of puberty.  It wasn't Brad Pitt or George Clooney pinned on the pre-teen girls' wall - it was these guys.  And this is why Archuleta has more appeal within the voting audience. 
 
However, it should be noted that David Cook doesn't need Idol in the long run.  Think about who has been sucessful after Idol:  Kelly Clarkson, CArrie Underwood, Jennifer Hudson, Chris Daughtry.  Now think about the miserable falures: Taylor Hicks, Ruben Studdard, Clay Aiken, Blake Lewis, Melissa Dolittle, Fantasia, etc.  There's a reason why some failed and some rose up.  The ones who were successful are not introduced as "american idol winner..." while those who failed are still clinging to the AI glory.  That is the key element - those that can stand alone without the AI banner are those that can make it in the real world.  Cook is more than just vocal talent - he has a good sound, a good look, is personable, and will put out a record of pop music.  He will sell whether he was on Idol or not.  David Archuleta is the complete opposite - he has no personality, he is young, inexperienced, has no widestream appeal and can only fit a niche audience, despite superior talent.  He will always be clinging to the AI title.  In 2 years, you won't hear "American Idol runner up David Cook" when he dominates the modern rock charts and is touring with Nickelback.  When Archuleta is playing at small concert halls to crowds of 50 year old women singing Michael Bolton covers, he is going to be "American Idol winner..."  As I have said all along - vocal talent is not the most important element.  Archuleta will win, but will ultimately fail compared to David Cook.
 
And on the criticism that this is the worst Idol season yet?  It could be.  There is little suspense when it was clear from Week 5 or so that this was a 2 man race, and nothing was going to stop that.  Nobody cares when there is an inevitable.  Additionally, these are people that really aren't the best of the best anymore.  This is the 7th crop of talent that is the best.... of those who haven't been on the previous seasons.  Is this even the elite anymore?  THAT is the inherent problem with Idol; that nobody is ever going to truly be any better or bigger than Kelly Clarkson - she is the one true American Idol.  And it doesn't hurt that, after this many seasons, the schtick gets stale.  Simon is stale.  Randy's thing is stale.  And Paula being nuts is stale.  They can't breeak up what got them this far, though, which puts them ina  serious conundrum: where do we go from here?  You leave the show as is.  Maybe it isn't as successful as it once was, but 20 million viewers on a "bad" night is still pretty damn impressive.
 
On a closing note, here are the best performances by each guy competing tonight:
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

All Baseball Today

Well, I guess not ALL baseball, but close.
 
First, the non-baseball information:
 
the Idol final is on tonight. 
 
 
And that's it.
 
Now, the important issue at hand.  Baseball.
 
Today I want to do quarter-report.   An analysis of my predictions so far, and some other issues.
 
The first issue is that stupid Joba Chamberlain first pump from a week or two ago.  I thought it was stupid, but whatever.  Tim Kurkjian, who I normally like, wrote a column about the first pump and how it has become a show-boat, me-first society in baseball, much the way it is in football.   That's fine - he is entitled to his opinion and I don't necessarily disagree with that.  What I do disagree with, however, is his choice of players to interview about playing the game "the right way:" Luis Gonzalez and Aaron Boone.  Just take a look at these numbers.
 
Boone 2002: 162 games, 83 runs, 146 hits, 26 HR, 87 RBI.
Best Boone Numbers from the rest of his 11 sesaon career: 143 games, 61 runs, 124 hits, 18 HR, 62 RBI. 
 
Gonzalez 2001: 57 HR, 142 RBI, .325 Avg, .429 OBP, .688 SLG, 1.117 OPS
Best Gonzalez Numbers from the rest of his 18 year career: 31 HR, 114 RBI, .336 avg, .403 OBP, .549 SLG, .952 OPS
 
Now, normally I would say "wow, career years for both guys" - Gonzo's happened at age 33, Boone's at age 29.  This isn't necessarily unreasonable.  Except that both occurred during the mysterious height of the steroid era.  Gonzo in particular - 26 HR more than his next-highest total?  165 points better in OPS than his next highest? These are not just fluke numbers.  Boone isn't nearly as bad, but upping all of your stats by 33% all in the same year?  Sounds fishy.  Or maybe we should just play the right way, like Aaron's brother, Bret Boone?  (career average of 20 HR, then has 37 and 35 in 2001 and 2003, respectively....and is mysteriously out of baseball only 2 years removed from a .535 SLG once steroid testing was implemented)
 
But enough of that.  How about some analysis at the quarter point in the season?
 
Here were my standings from the beginning of the season:
 
NL West: Diamondbacks, Rockies, Dodgers, Padres, Giants
NL Central: Cubs, Brewers, Reds, Cardinals, Astros, Pirates
NL East: Mets, Braves, Phillies, Nationals, Marlins
 
AL East: Red Sox, Yankees, Blue Jays, Rays (although not far back), Orioles
AL Central: Tigers, Indians, Twins, Royals, White Sox
AL West: Mariners, Angels, Rangers, Oakland
 
So who was I way off on? 
 
Rockies were supposed to be good.  Not quite as good as the run at the end of last season, but superior to the rest of a bad division.  I was way off - this team is terrible.
 
Cardinals were terrible on paper.  And are somehow scraping things together to get some wins.  I am 100% not sold on this team.  It's offense is Pujols and that's it, they don't have a closer, and their rotation consists of a bunch of guys that literally nobody has ever heard of.  I think I will be right in the long runon them.
 
Marlins are still performing way over their heads.  THey have literally no starting pitching to speak of and are currently getting lucky.  No way does Dan Uggla hit .350 all year.  No way does Mike Jacobs hit 45 HR.  No way is Hanley really this good.  Ok wait, that last one might be accurate.
 
The Blue Jays are really struggling, mostly becaue of a weak offense.  Vernon Wells is hurt, they got rid of Frank Thomas, and a bunch of other guys are performing well below expectations.   The pitching is very strong, though. 
 
White Sox and Tigers.  I had these teams reversed, and it was surprising.  I thought Ozzie Guillen was a loose canon, and I was right.  I also had Justin Verlander as my Cy Young...and I was way off.  An ERA over 6 doesn't win the lumber?  Oh, and I had Miguel Cabrera as my AL MVP.  Not quite.
 
Oakland, like the Marlins, are performing over expectations.  THey are going to trade away any talent they have and will be a last place team when all is said and doe.
 
The Mariners are terrible.  Bedard is hurt, they have no offense, F-Her is performing way below expectations, and just about everything that could go wrong has. 
 
....And I had John Maine as my NL Cy Young.  Again, not quite, although he isn't pitching THAT bad.
 
But for the most part, I have been pretty spot on.  Not bad.  Not bad at all.
 
Now some suprises, disappointments, and should-have-seen-it-comings:
 
Top suprise has to be Cliff Lee.  This was a guy who spent some of last year in AAA.  Now he leads the AL in ERA.  Prior to this weekend, he had an ERA under 1, with 44 Ks to 4 BBs.  Those are like little league numbers.  He will come back down to earth, but even then, this is a ridiculously good season for him.
 
Carlos Quentin is absolutely mashing.  He was involved in a deal with the D-backs in the off season and is leading the AL in HRs right now.  Like Lee, he will calm down, but even if he is an average player from this point forth, he still had a great season.
 
Edinson Voloquez was the guy who was traded for Josh Hamilton.  A 24-year old fireballer in the Texas system, he never had the chance to flourish.  Unlike Cliff Lee, this kid is legit.  His strikeouts and HRs allowed are mind-boggling, as is that MLB-best ERA of 1.2 or so.  Kid is a beast.  He was a top prospect that didn't develop fast enough for the Rangers and now he has the opportunity.  As long as Dusty Baker doesn't kill him, he should have a really impressive year.
 
The Cardinals survivng on that pitching is a big shock.  Ankiel just got hurt, though, and Isringhausen relinquished the closer role due to his recent inability to get anyone out.  Although not a great team, they are much much better than I expected.
 
The Top Bust of 2008?  Detroit Tigers.  This was supposed to be a World Series team and instead is awful.  We all knew the pitching was a bit questionable, but not this bad.  The offense is really the shocker - this was supposed to be one of the best Os of all time, and instead has been shut out 8 times this year.
 
Ryan Howard still hits HRs, but his sub-.220 average isn't going to cut it.  He is going to shatter his own K record this year.  And for $10 million, thank you MLB arbitration.
 
Jimmy Rollins is a major disappointment.  This guy played 162 games last year and was the MVP.  This year he gets hurt in the first 2 weeks of the season and misses an entire month.  Injuries are not an excuse.
 
The Padres are freaking terrible.  They were going to be bad, but not this bad.  Yuck.
 
The Rockies.  (see above).
 
Verlander (see above).
 
The NL East hasn't lived up to the hype.  There were supposd to be three truly elite teams in this division - The Mets, Phils, and Braves.  Instead, they all middle around .500 while the MARLINS are in first place.  And they're not all beating up on each other - these teams just aren't very good.  The Mets lost 3 of 4 to the Nats last week, the Braves just lost 3 of 4 to the Pirates, and the Phillies lost 3 in a row to the Blue Jays and Nationals.  They'll all storm back but age and injury has been a factor on all teams.
 
TRAVIS HAFNER.  He isn't necessarily a bigger bust than some other players by performance, but he is because of the repeated lofty expectations for a guy who really isn't that good.  Outside of his .306/42 HR 2006, he hasn't done anything noteworthy.  Last year those .250/24 HR numbers should not have led to these expectations.  I knew he wasn;t actually any good, but everyone else drank his bathwater, so i put him in the busts list.  As of today, he is batting .228 with 4 HR through a quarter of the season.  And throw Grady Sizemore into that boat too.  Huge expectations but rarely performs.  He has lost 20+ points on his batting average since 2006.  He makes way too many outs for a leadoff man.  And the greatest leadoff man in history, according to most projections.
 
Then, outside of the suprises and the busts, we have the should-have-seen-it-coming category.
 
Andruw Jones.  This guy's numbers have been downright bad since he hit 50 HR in 2005.  His average is always terrible, but now factor in a bigger ballpark, about 20 lbs of flab and no incentive of a big contract, and he had bad news written all over him.  $18m for nothing.
 
Hafner goes in this category too.  See above.
 
Zack Greinke.  This kid was a major prospect a few years ago and was projected as an ace in 2005.  Then he had mental breakdowns in 2006 and started the comeback in 2007.  This kid is legit, and has been for a while.  He isn't coming out of nowhere.
 
Barry Zito is terrible.  Much like Jones, he was awarded a big contract despite being quite a few years since his last big season.  2002 Cy Young to the bullpen in 2008.  Really a fall from grace for what seems like a genuinely nice guy.  But he should just be thrilled he didn't end up on the Mets - the NY media would literally crucify him.
 
Johan Santana.  Yes, he is an ace.  Yes, he is having a fine year.  Yes, he is a second half pitcher.  But this was a guy who was going to win 20 games this season, without question.  He was going to be so dominant it wouldn't even be funny.  He was going to save the Mets from 2007's collapse.  Instead, he is having a very good season, but is also on pace to give up 40 HR this year (way out in front of the league) and only has 4 wins.  This isn't a Cy Young caliber season....yet.  But this should have been expected - look at his numbers in Minnesota.  The offenses in the AL Central and NL East are comparable, the parks are comparable, and he only has an ERA around 3 each year.  This year included.  And an ERA of 3 in the NL isn't winning the Cy Young.
 
Tampa Bay had the pieces there.  Some were predicting 88 wins.  We all should have seen this coming.  Lots of good, young talent, a solid rotation, a good bullpen, and a competant manager = a decent team.
 
And the biggest of all: Ian Kennedy and Phil Hughes sucking, and sucking badly.  Nobody should have ever believed in these guys.  Kennedy throws 88 and is a control pitcher with less than half a season under his belt.  Hughes is a 21 year old kid who hasn't developed any secondary pitches that can be thrown for strikes, I don't care what scouting says.  Neither of these guys was ready to face major league hitters on a full time basis and the Yankee propaganda machine prevented that news from being spread.  This rotation was thin, and there's a reason Tampa is going to beat them into the playoffs this year. 
 
And there you have it.  Due to the wealth of content today, no video.  Sorry.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Long Awaited Return

Sorry for the no-posts and just outright bad posts recently - this past weekend was the hurdle I had to clear before my life got a lot less stressful.  I had been talking about my weekend on this blog for a while, so how about a few links, then a nice lengthy recap.  Sound good?  Let's do this.
 
Courtesy of Mary Katharine Ham - Food and Health Inspection violations in baseball parks.  The ones I find disturbing are the brand new stadiums like Philly's Citizen's Bank Park having problems.  Of course there's going to be issues in Shea (44 years old) or Yankee Stadium (80 something years old). 
 
I haven't watched the Office yet, so a review is coming soon.
 
Mets crushed the Yankees in both games this weekend.  Last night's was particularly ugly - 11-2 even after a Carlos Delgado HR was mysteriously disallowed.  Which the umpire even came out and said was the wrong call
 
I still like interleague play, although I have to question some of the scheduling.  I thought the first weekend was for rivalries?  No Cubs-White Sox, no Giants-As, and no Cardinals-Royals.  We still got Mets-Yankees, but what about everyone else?
 
This is why I cannot yet be considered a "grown man" - and I am referring directly to the use of code words.  They are a way of life for me.
 
And now...my weekend.  It was the definition of goods and bads. 
 
I left work early on Thursday (good).  I then sat in traffic for an hour and a half on the way to Baltimore (bad).  Saw Van Halen (awesome - and pictures will be coming in a minute).  Got home much later than I can normally stay awake (bad).  Took the day off from work on Friday (good), but had a ton to do and still had to get up early (bad).  Drove to NY to see Mets-Yankees (good), but got stuck in 7 1/2 hours of traffic (bad).  And a quick note about that.  I hate New Jersey.  The Entire effing state.  I've driven 95 in NJ at least 15 times and have never once, not one single time, not been in a traffic jam.  Who knew that 2pm was rush hour in the Garden State?  Or, for that matter, 11pm on a Saturday.  Seriously, I hate everything about it.  And to add to that, is it illegal to have a gas station within 100 miles of a highway exit?  I drove around for at least 15 minutes before I found one stinking station off a very major exit on the NJ Turnpike.  What is wrong with these Jersey people?  And to top it off, I never really liked Bruce Springsteen.  And I know, if I don't like him - there must be something seriously wrong with me.  It's not that he's not that good, his band isn't that good, or that his workin-man schtick would only work if he wasn't a multibillionaire, it's that I am mentally retarded, right?  Bring on the hate mail.  Oh, and the odor of the Newark area?  Literally overpowered the interior of my car.  Disgusting.
 
Anyways, back to the story.  Semi-relaxing drive for some of the way while listening to an intriguing book on tape - yes I am a dork (good), but having it rain the entire trip (bad).  Not having it rain incredibly hard (good), until when I needed to park my car and get to the train station - now it's time for torential downpour (bad).  Getting to NY for a weekend away (good), but having the game be cancelled (bad).  Getting to see some friends from home (good) but being yelled at the entire time because I got stuck in traffic (bad).  Still pissed about NJ (bad). 
 
Resolved a seemingly terrible Friday by going out with my brother in NY (good) but staying out until 5am (bad).  Waking up early to get back to DC (good) but having a hangover and 4ish hours of sleep (bad).  Not having to drive through NJ back (good), but taking the bus instead (bad).  Although it should be noted that the bus ride was actually quite nice - i had space, there weren't crazy drug dealers, it was relatively cheap and I got to sleep most of the way.  Saturday night went out with friends (good) but had to settle for our 4th choice because the others were too crowded (bad).  Seriously, I hate NJ.
 
Did nothing on Sunday - both good and bad.  Mets won both games against the Yanks (good) but I got to see about a total of 4 innings of the 2 games (bad).
 
So, as you can tell, it was interesting. 
 
And now a bit more about VH.  Man, they were awesome.  This is the first tour with David Lee Roth in 20+ years, and man it was great.  I was a little worried because DLR has looked like complete hell for a bunch of years now, and Eddie has been in and out of rehab for the 2000s.  They kicked out Michael ANthony in favor of Eddie's son Wolfgang on the bass. None of this mattered once they hit the stage.  They didn't play a single song after 1984 (both the album and the year), as that was the end of the DLR era.  The end of the true Van Halen.  So they stuk to the classics.  Hot for teacher.  Panama.  Runnin with the Devil.  Atomic Punk.  Jump.  You Really Got Me.  Ice Cream Man.  Pretty Woman.  This was literally a down-the-line rendition of Van Halen's greatest hits, and they werte certainly great.  Wolfgang was good enough, Alex was awesome even at age 55, and DLR and Eddie co-existed long enough not to kill each other.  Eddie was a little sloppy here and there, especially with his timing, but whatever.  Roth is seriously in the best shape, possibly of any 53 year old in the world.  His body is just like it was in 1984, even with washboard abs.  Sorry if that was a little gay, it just needs to be stated that he was in unbelievable shape.  Which gave him the power to rock like it was stilll the 80s, acting like the kid on ADD during the set.  He ran around, danced, jumped and sang like a madman.  Just an incredible time.
 
And here are some of those VH photos.  (I don't want to flood people with a ton of content in one day, so it's just a link for now)
 
And while we're at it - how about 2 videos (sorry about the sound quality).  Hot for Teacher and Panama (still uploading...), my 2 favorite songs.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No post today

Sorry everybody.  Too much to do and not enough to talk about.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RIP Seinfeld

Today is Wednesday, one day closer to a crazy weekend.  Van Halen, a drive to NYC, Mets-Yankees, then a whirlwind return from NY to DC is in line all by Saturday afternoon.  Whew.  Madness.
 
Annnnyways, important things today, important things today...
 
Idol last night - top 3.  David Archuleta is a whiney pieace of crap.  Syesha is a babe and was torn apart for no apparent reason, and David Cook struggled outside of his last song, which was pretty good.  I think more and more that Cook is going to win this thing.  Syesha is going to have a hell of a career on Broadway, but the judges are so insistent on making her the "black woman" singer that they are blind to the fact that this is not what suits her best.  They pick Alicia Keys for her...she picks Broadway songs.  They are not on the same wavelength.  Archuleta is a tool.
 
Mets won last night, giving Johnny Maine 5 wins.  My predictions for him winning the Cy Young are still on track.
 
Johan Santana got pushed back a day so that he can pitch Game 1 (Friday) against the Yanks.  Which I will be attending.
 
This wrestling and xenophobia rant has hit the cutting room floor again.  In it's place, I just found out taht the DC BBQ festival is the weekendf of June 21-22.  Hell yea.
 
McDonalds tomorrow is having a give-away for their new Southern Style CHicken Sandwich duing lunch and dinner.  It's a chic-fil-a sandwich for most of the country, but we northerners don't have chic-fil-a in such volume as the Southern states, so this may be the first experience some NYers have with it.  Also, during breakfast they have free southern style chicken biscuits.  This is what I look forward to.
 
Today marked the 10 year anniversary since the airing of the last episode of Seinfeld.  The episode itself was a clunker, but it marked the end of an era.  Since then, there has been no great American television program.  Think about it - 10 years later, Seinfeld is still the best (and one of the most popular) comedies on tv.  Doesn't that say something?  So, to celebrate the end of an era, here are some of the top 25 best Seinfeld moments...
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lebron James Has No Regard For Human Life!

Seriously.  That was a call from last night's game.  Too bad Kevin Harlan had already used it for a Kobe dunk.  Whatever.
 
This techno group is #1 in the UK right now.  This seriously sounds like something from Dance Dance Revolution more than it does pop music.
 
Ok next, the best movie ever made: Poultrygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead.
  
 
The Red Sox are literally on TV every 5 seconds.  I think they must have a contract wth ESPN that says they have to be on at least twice a week.  Terrible.
 
Gagne was such a huge juicer it's hilarious.  Remember when he converted 84 straight saves?  Now he blows one for every one he saves.  Awful.  The Mitchell Report was dead-on for him.  But that makes me question, another guy who was DOMINANT over the same span but now is terrible?  Barry Zito.  Just a thought.  Also, Shawn Green (50 HRs down to 17 at the age of 32?), Guillermo Mota (nailed for steroids last season), and Paul Lo Duca(named in the Mitchell Report) were all on the same team as Gagne.  Weird.  Oh, and Adrian Beltre, who hit 48 HRs in 2004 and 12 the next season.
 
I don't really care about the Joba fist-pump drama; just be prepared for every single person to fist-pump when they do even the dumbest thing against Joba, like foul a ball off or take a pitch for a ball.  If a strikeout of a reserve player with nobody on in a 2-run game is worthy of an obnoxious fist-pump, so is taking a walk against Joba.  I just beg that they don't turn this into the NFL where every play has to be celebrated.
 
Mets lost last night.  Can't lose to the Nats at home.
 
New American Gladiators started last night.  Hell of a show.  But my main criticism with the new gladiators (Rocket and Jet, last sesaon's winners) is that they aren't huge.  The competitors win becaue they are fast against the big strong lumbering gladiators.  But if you are going to make the formerly small and quick gladiators, they take away the entire advantage of the gladiators themselves - their ridiculous stregnth.  Jet (the girl) will fare better because there is less difference in size betwene the competitors and gladiators, but the guys are absurd.  You can't take 5' 7", 175 lb Rocket and compare him to 6' 8", 320 lb Justice.  He is just going to end up being a guy they use in certain events like the Wall and the race events. 
 
Mary Katharine, for those who know her, brought in apple pie today.  It was delicious.
 
A guy in Australia got in trouble for putting a seatbelt on his 30-pack but not his 5 year old
 
And now, I leave you with this....
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I have to apologize

For the terrible post today.  I just 1.) don't have a lot going on 2.) have too much going on.
 
Work is major stress today because TH just added some new formatting to the website.  I am saddled with all the complaints.
 
The Office was pretty solid this week, I have to admit.  I was entertained, laughed, and enjoyed it.  I am critical because it didn't take place in the office, and I think they could have done a lot more with the Dwight/Angela stuff.  The golf outing was hysterical.  My roommate Dan thinks that Jim has gotten too stale and is now just boring, but I think he is the anchor that keeps the show in check.  The job fair was pretty funny, although, again, Michael is so far out in left field that he is almost not funny anymore.  Now he's just a jerk.  Oh well, I laughed nonetheless.   I look forward to what they come up with for this week.
 
I love it when people call for help, then hang up on me when I call them back.  Real classy.
 
Going to see Van Halen on Thursday in Baltimore.  Super pumped.  This is the first tour of VH with DLR in my lifetime.  Wow.
 
Going to Mets vs. Yankees on Friday.  Should be a good one, even if tickets were a bit pricey.  Coming back to DC Saturday for a crazy weekend.  I need a day off.
 
I get very angry when someone gives you directions with full confidence....then has them wrong.  If you don't know where you're going, which you clearly didn't, don't even bother.  I would rather go look them up myself rather then end up at the wrong place then start from square 1.
 
CNN has an article up about the basis for the new Indiana Jones movies.  Seems pretty cool.
 
They found the Lindberg baby today.  Such a weird story.
 
The Onion is awesome.  This article is awesome.  The Nats hit a ball that broke the Capitol Rotunda.  Awesome.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Friday Ridiculousness

Is ridiculousness even a word?  Whatever.
 
Ok so I had some light news and then was going to tackl;e a semi-serious issue, but I got hung up and can only tackle the light stuff.  But alas, here we go:
 
Stay at home moms, if they were to receive a salary, would make about $117,000 a year, according to Salary.com.  It should be more.
 
I saw Harold and Kumar go to White Castle: Escape from Guantanamo Bay last night.  It was interesting, to say the least.  It was a typical stoner movie full of toilet humor and lots of foul language and dru references.  And it was hilarious. 
 
I really enjoy those Nature Valley granola bars.  Peanut Butter, Oats and Honey, Apple Cinamon....they're all great. 
 
Last night Richie Sexon of the Mariners got in a fight with Cason Gabbad of the Rangers.  I love baseball fights.
 
I was going to, again, tackle a tough issue, but decided against it.  Instead, we have a 3-part video entry.
 
First:  it is Billy Joel's birthday today.  Happy Birthday to a true New Yorker.
 
 
 
Next.  Today is L. Ron Hubbard's anniversary of publishing some crazy science fiction book which became the basis for scientology.  South Park said it best:  this is really what they believe. 
 
 
And finally, a funny video courtesy of TH's own Katie Favazza.  Cookin' with Coolio?  Count me in.
 
 
 
And that's it for a Friday where I got presented with a monotonous project at my prime blogging time.  Sorry.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not a whole lot to talk about here

What can I say, it's been a slow day?
 
I love peanut butter.
 
Jason Castro got voted off and really, who cares?
 
 
Today marks the anniversary of David Berkowitz' confession.  For those that don't know, this was the Son of Sam.  Man was completely nuts, but really did terrorize a city like no other.  I think the only comparable incident would be the DC Snip in 2003, where people were legitimately afraid to get out of their cars in this area.  My mother lived in NY through the summer of 77 and she said it was the scariest thing ever - every young person was scared for their lives when they would leave their apartments.  Sounds miserable.  And then Newman took over his mail route.
 
I know this isn't entirely relevant, but I recently was gazing at the Cleveland Indians.  Every year they are everyone's favorite to win the division, win the AL, win the World Series.  Every year they underperform.  Since 2005, the expectations have been through the roof.  So much young talent, great pitching, unbelievable staff, etc.  Hafner, Sabathia, Carmona, Martinez, etc etc.  But I think there' something fishy going on here.  THis isn't just a bunch of guys having bad years over and over.  Every person on the Indians roster had a career year in 2005 or 2006, when expectations were high.  Look at Hafner, for example.  2005?  33 HRs.  2006?  42 HRs, .308 average.  2007?  24 HR with .266 average.  And this year?  He is projected at 15 HRs and a .209 average.  2 years later your BA drops 100 points and you lose 30 HRs?  When you're supposedly in your prime (28, 29, 30)?  This is all a little strange...
 
Take a look at some of these other players who had star years in 2005 and 2006 and now are terribly underachieving:
Ronnie Belliard, Ben Broussard, Ryan Garko, Josh Barfield, Cliff Lee (spent last year in the minors despite 2008 resurgence - he had 18 wins in 05, 14 in 06, and 5 in 07), Aaron Boone, Jhonny Peralta, and now we have begun to see the decline of Sabathia.  This doesn't mention Guillermo Mota, Bob Wickman, or any of the other mediocre players who had fantastic seasons for the 05-06 Indians.  I smell steroids.  Most of these guys can't even get playing time any more, yet they were budding superstars when they played in Cleveland.  It's just something to consider...
 
Here's a video - be warned, it has some obscene material, but it's very funny. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »